CASE: Selena Gomez hacked photo pictures

WHEN: July 2014

STORY: Some random dbag posts allegedly hacked images of Selena Gomez. He has no credentials and all he does is run a tumblr page. Failing online rags like Hollywood Life and other shitbag sites find the images and claims them to be Selena Gomez. Selena has publicized that the images are not of her and she never took any pics like that.

Lets look at all the images in question (hosted on IMGBOX)

OUR PROOF: There really is no proof. The girl does look like Selena at first glance. Once you line up images of Selena next to the girl, you notice things. They say the moles line up perfectly with Selena Gomez’s moles. That would be a pretty good clue. Unfortunately I timed myself, and it took me less than 3 minutes with rudimentary tools in PS to create the image below. You can’t tell which one was altered and which was not. That is about it.

RANDOM IMAGE OF TOPLESS GIRL WITH A FEW MOLES

There is some things to discuss, so lets break it down.

THE EVIDENCE: Let’s take some of the images and break them down.

THE MOLES The images “prove” that the two women have the same moles. Well not exactly true. The top moles seems to be quite a bit off… and as stated above this could of been done in photoshop in less than a minute.
LIPS, CHIN AND FRECKLES Though the alleged images has a Gomez feel, the lips and chin are different and the slight freckles are no where to be found anywhere. Notice that Selena’s top lip does not have the “v” that the other photo has and Selena has smaller lips in general. The actual shape of the lips are different. Gomez has a longer chin as you can see and the freckles to the left of Selena… no where to be found in any of the alleged images.
THE BOOBS One thing that is hard to discredit is the breasts. These are hard to to dismiss (pun intended). THey look the same size, the nipples are close and they are both wonderful. Doesn’t “prove” anything but the boobs are very close.
THE BUTT DIMPLES In the alleged photos, the girl has very pronounced butt dimples. Selena Gomez does not have butt dimples. I found an image when she was flexing her bum and when she wasn’t… I dated many girls with butt dimples and they were almost always there. Selena does not have them.

CONCLUSION: What do we have. Taking 30 seconds to compare photos of Selena and this girl would of been all the proof you need. We also have no back story. Just some random degenerate posting images that he most likely found on a website called imagefap. A bunch of these images are stuck in a gallery of other amateur girls on the date of November 13, 2013. So that destroys any possible back story of hacked images. The moles, the supposed “clincher” for the link between Gomez and this girl… fail again, could not even match one of the moles right in the photoshop attempt. No butt dimples on Selena, but apparent on this girl. Even the face does not look like Selena. The only thing that matches is ONE out of two moles and the size and shape of her breasts (close).

I am not going to have links to the original images or horrid websites. The guy posting them is a jack wagon, obviously bored and is learning photoshop. The worthless online rag hollywood life jumped on this, and made a push to get noticed with “Selena Gomez Topless Pics!” They are quickly becoming a “cry wolf” site and no one is really paying attention to them anymore. They failed on Selena’s real/fake breasts (break down can be found on bigbewbs.com) and crying wolf that these were Selena topless? Just sad. These images are OBVIOUSLY not Selena Gomez. Good looking girl and has a resemblance to her, but when matched up… it’s not even close.

CASE #B003 CLOSED – FAKE

What do you think?

 Loading ...

CASE: Olivia Munn hacked personal photos.

WHEN: March 2012.

STORY: Olivia Munn had her phone and accounts hacked to unveil what appears to be one horny woman. The original few images had her in various states of undress while the images that came out later were sexier and even more explicit… to Chris Pine who she was dating at the time. She claims they were not of her, of course she does. The story is on TMZ if you wish to search for it there.

Here are the first few images hacked (hosted on IMGBOX)

NOTE: Now the nude image and the faceless images are the true images in question for the first batch. A day or so later reveals more images, and much more explicit. (images hosted on IMGBOX)

OUR PROOF: The images with the face in them is proof that we start with. The nude and faceless images are in question to whether or not this is her. The second set of images are most definitely Olivia, and are pretty kick ass. But is the text something she wrote or is it something someone else put on her images?

This is much more complicated than Christina Hendricks hacked images. So lets get started with the evidence.

THE EVIDENCE: Let’s take the images and break them down.

THE LINGERIE IMAGES This is pretty self explanatory. Same lingerie in all pictures, same body style same house. This is HER. This will verify these images… but the text..?
THE FONT / TEXT On twitter or facebook, Olivia has posted a few images with text and arrows. Each part of this is identical, color, arrow style as the hacked images. It would take someone a lot of thought to premeditate this and know she was dating Chris at this exact time (which has been verified).
THE MIRROR AFFECT (click on image for all three images combined) Looking at images that can be compared, we find the pink bikini and the alleged nude pic.If you looked at these in a set of images of the same girl you would not question it. Same body style same curves, and the same girl which we prove shortly.
MATCHING UP PT.1 Here we see that the ring on her finger is the same in the lingerie pic, the bathroom is the same in the nude pic… the drain also looks very similar to something Olivia posted on twitter before. Not conclusive, but it’s damn close.
MATCHING UP PT.2 (Click on the image to see all four images combined) So here we are again, same ring, to the bathroom, same bathroom to nude woman and same nude women to nude woman in hotel room (apparently). DIfferent bottles people say, but how many times you keep the same bottles over the course of months? Exactly. It can’t get much more evident than this.

CONCLUSION: What do we have. A ring and bra that match an image in a bathroom; this is 100% valid.  Two bathrooms that are the same; this is 100% valid. Two images of naked women who… are the same; this is 100% valid. If this is faked, they were masterful. They found an identical duplicate of Olivia Munn’s body, crept into her house and took naked pics there. The images were not altered in anyway so photoshopping was not a possible option. The rings match, the bra matches, the bathroom matches the body matches. Case closed.

Sorry Olivia, I know it sucks you got your phone and accounts hacked. But these are all you, and for me, without a doubt. For BPI, the case has been closed and the images have been verified. There is no shame in this, Olivia is a gorgeous woman, who surprised the hell out of me with her talent… The HBO Newsroom she is brilliant in it, and she turned into something more than a pretty face.

CASE #B002 CLOSED – VERIFIED

What do you think?

 Loading ...

CASE: Christina Hendricks hacked personal photos.

WHEN: March 2012.

STORY: Christina’s phone was hacked and personal images were stolen. They were then released out to the internet for all to see. Read the story at TMZ if you wish to search for it. Christina and her PR claim the topless image was not her.
Here are the five images (hosted on imgbox)

OUR PROOF: Christina’s rep confirms her phone WAS indeed hacked recently … and multiple self-shots were stolen — including several showing a busty Hendricks barely dressed, without make-up, presumably at home. So this tells us she had her phone hacked and images stolen.

All 5 images were released at the same time, by the same person. I have no sources for this, but articles I read confirm this. I can’t use this as solid proof but claims have been made they were all from the same source at the same time.

THE EVIDENCE: Let’s take the images and break them down. Below are five comparisons to prove that all images are Christina Hendricks. Some are very obvious while others might take a little work to uncover the evidence.

THE RING The first comparison is the image of the hacked photos, zoomed into the ring. The other image shows you the same ring she is wearing out in public.
THE EYGLASSES The second comparison is the image from the hacked photos, showing her black rimmed retro looking glasses. The other image shows the same pair of glasses that she had images taken with out in public.
4 BEWB COMPARISON The third comparison is four images of Christina’s breasts. The first image is of Christina Topless (upper left), the other three are of Christina’s cleavage she showed off in various states of cleavage. You can see the many similarities to the size and roundness. Not real proof but it helps.
SUPER-IMPOSED The fourth comparison is a super imposed image of the topless photo over a random candid image. About the same size, about the same shape. Again not real proof but it sure helps.
THE VEINS The fifth comparison and the most damning evidence is her vein pattern. As much as this makes her breasts look terrible, this is proof that the topless image matches the candid images of Christina. The pattern in the veins match and the mole matches.

CONCLUSION: I have never witnessed a fake image to be so good you could not prove it to be a fake. If the topless image is a fake, the counterfeiter must of sifted through thousands of images, made the resolution the exact same as the other 4 images, matched up her mole perfectly, flipped the image to make sure it is a mirror image and inlay (perfectly mind you) her exact vein pattern into this image.

All of that is near impossible without some sort of trace. Bottom line, we proved the “set” of images are all of Christina, glasses match, rings match, and her face is present in 3 of the 5 images. The 2 headless images, one has the exact ring and the other topless one has her exact vein and mole placement. Nothing else needs to be proved. Sorry Christina Hendricks, deny it all you want but Bewb Picture Investigations has just proven that these are ALL your images and your boobs. I don’t know why she would deny it, they are as beautiful as she is.

CASE #B001 CLOSED – VERIFIED

What do you think?

 Loading ...