STORY: Christina’s phone was hacked and personal images were stolen. They were then released out to the internet for all to see. Read the story at TMZ if you wish to search for it. Christina and her PR claim the topless image was not her.
Here are the five images (hosted on imgbox)
OUR PROOF: Christina’s rep confirms her phone WAS indeed hacked recently … and multiple self-shots were stolen — including several showing a busty Hendricks barely dressed, without make-up, presumably at home. So this tells us she had her phone hacked and images stolen.
All 5 images were released at the same time, by the same person. I have no sources for this, but articles I read confirm this. I can’t use this as solid proof but claims have been made they were all from the same source at the same time.
THE EVIDENCE: Let’s take the images and break them down. Below are five comparisons to prove that all images are Christina Hendricks. Some are very obvious while others might take a little work to uncover the evidence.
THE RING
The first comparison is the image of the hacked photos, zoomed into the ring. The other image shows you the same ring she is wearing out in public.
THE EYGLASSES
The second comparison is the image from the hacked photos, showing her black rimmed retro looking glasses. The other image shows the same pair of glasses that she had images taken with out in public.
4 BEWB COMPARISON
The third comparison is four images of Christina’s breasts. The first image is of Christina Topless (upper left), the other three are of Christina’s cleavage she showed off in various states of cleavage. You can see the many similarities to the size and roundness. Not real proof but it helps.
SUPER-IMPOSED
The fourth comparison is a super imposed image of the topless photo over a random candid image. About the same size, about the same shape. Again not real proof but it sure helps.
THE VEINS
The fifth comparison and the most damning evidence is her vein pattern. As much as this makes her breasts look terrible, this is proof that the topless image matches the candid images of Christina. The pattern in the veins match and the mole matches.
CONCLUSION: I have never witnessed a fake image to be so good you could not prove it to be a fake. If the topless image is a fake, the counterfeiter must of sifted through thousands of images, made the resolution the exact same as the other 4 images, matched up her mole perfectly, flipped the image to make sure it is a mirror image and inlay (perfectly mind you) her exact vein pattern into this image.
All of that is near impossible without some sort of trace. Bottom line, we proved the “set” of images are all of Christina, glasses match, rings match, and her face is present in 3 of the 5 images. The 2 headless images, one has the exact ring and the other topless one has her exact vein and mole placement. Nothing else needs to be proved. Sorry Christina Hendricks, deny it all you want but Bewb Picture Investigations has just proven that these are ALL your images and your boobs. I don’t know why she would deny it, they are as beautiful as she is.
Loading ...
BPI: Case of the Veiny Bewbs
Posted by Bewb Newz in BPI
CASE: Christina Hendricks hacked personal photos.
WHEN: March 2012.
STORY: Christina’s phone was hacked and personal images were stolen. They were then released out to the internet for all to see. Read the story at TMZ if you wish to search for it. Christina and her PR claim the topless image was not her.
Here are the five images (hosted on imgbox)
OUR PROOF: Christina’s rep confirms her phone WAS indeed hacked recently … and multiple self-shots were stolen — including several showing a busty Hendricks barely dressed, without make-up, presumably at home. So this tells us she had her phone hacked and images stolen.
All 5 images were released at the same time, by the same person. I have no sources for this, but articles I read confirm this. I can’t use this as solid proof but claims have been made they were all from the same source at the same time.
THE EVIDENCE: Let’s take the images and break them down. Below are five comparisons to prove that all images are Christina Hendricks. Some are very obvious while others might take a little work to uncover the evidence.
The first comparison is the image of the hacked photos, zoomed into the ring. The other image shows you the same ring she is wearing out in public.
The second comparison is the image from the hacked photos, showing her black rimmed retro looking glasses. The other image shows the same pair of glasses that she had images taken with out in public.
The third comparison is four images of Christina’s breasts. The first image is of Christina Topless (upper left), the other three are of Christina’s cleavage she showed off in various states of cleavage. You can see the many similarities to the size and roundness. Not real proof but it helps.
The fourth comparison is a super imposed image of the topless photo over a random candid image. About the same size, about the same shape. Again not real proof but it sure helps.
The fifth comparison and the most damning evidence is her vein pattern. As much as this makes her breasts look terrible, this is proof that the topless image matches the candid images of Christina. The pattern in the veins match and the mole matches.
CONCLUSION: I have never witnessed a fake image to be so good you could not prove it to be a fake. If the topless image is a fake, the counterfeiter must of sifted through thousands of images, made the resolution the exact same as the other 4 images, matched up her mole perfectly, flipped the image to make sure it is a mirror image and inlay (perfectly mind you) her exact vein pattern into this image.
All of that is near impossible without some sort of trace. Bottom line, we proved the “set” of images are all of Christina, glasses match, rings match, and her face is present in 3 of the 5 images. The 2 headless images, one has the exact ring and the other topless one has her exact vein and mole placement. Nothing else needs to be proved. Sorry Christina Hendricks, deny it all you want but Bewb Picture Investigations has just proven that these are ALL your images and your boobs. I don’t know why she would deny it, they are as beautiful as she is.
CASE #B001 CLOSED – VERIFIED
What do you think?
Comments